Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Madeleine Ann Eames's avatar

I’ve been thinking about this. I think if a man is yelling or abusing a woman, his political opinions are obsolete. Maybe he’s a good scientist but his opinions about people and how they should be cared for are void. You cannot have one without the other. Patriarchy is personal and political. To care for a woman is to care for humanity.

Expand full comment
Suze's avatar

I think the answer to your question is that it wasn’t important to the people who decided these men were heroes. We cannot deny their influence in their given fields, but most folk want their heroes to be unblemished. The women they abused on their way to fame are merely collateral damage, not important, but the uncomfortable truth is that men cannot achieve anything without women, even if it’s a nanny to look after their children.

I read this book https://www.wbg.org.uk/article/who-cooked-adam-smiths-dinner-a-review/

I think male heroes need to be seen as flawed as any ordinary people are.

And, yes, please, more of the same plus the women who made history (Marie Curie, Florence Nightingale and others and who supported them. What did they sacrifice to be successful?)

Expand full comment
145 more comments...

No posts